| Young children in a classroom leased by Head Start at a community college. (Photo by Maansi Srivastava, The Washington Post) |
“Lack of child care access is a countrywide crisis and costs an estimated $122 billion every year in lost earnings, productivity and revenue,” reports The Washington Post editorial board.
Here’s a solution: “There’s nothing like a good match, and a partnership announced this week
between the National Head Start Association and the Association of
Community College Trustees to put more Head Start facilities on
community college campuses sets up a perfect couple,” the Post opines. The numbers tell the story, “More than 1 in 5
college students are parents. About 1 in 10 are single mothers, and nearly two-thirds of those mothers whose children are younger than six live at or below the poverty line. . . . Meanwhile, about 180,000 spots in the Department of Health and Human
Services’ Head Start early education program, which is supposed to serve
that population, are empty. Only 100 or so locations are on community
college campuses. . . . Put these two realities together. . . . and the opportunity becomes
clear.”
What are the other issues? “Single mothers are much less likely to complete a degree than are students without children. All evidence suggests that on-campus child care services can change the equation — at Monroe Community College
in Rochester, N.Y., for instance, use of those facilities multiplied
parents’ graduation rates by more than three times,” the Board reports. “The
trouble, in many cases, is money. Sandra Kurtinitis, president of the
Community College of Baltimore County, described how three childcare
facilities in her network of campuses shrank to one. Many student
parents couldn’t afford to pay for all-day services, and CCBC, after the
pandemic tightened its budget, couldn’t afford to pay to subsidize
them.”
Why is Head Start the answer? “It comes at no
cost to those who qualify, and for any center to operate, it must also
secure a 20 percent philanthropic match. Colleges can effectively
provide that match by ‘leasing’ the space for the program, except at no
charge. Thus, they can offer a child care option to their students that
is essentially free to them, and free to the students, too,” they write. “Head Start, in turn, ends up with a robust population from which to
recruit children to educate while their parents have time to pursue
their education, too. What’s more, college students studying early
learning can get hands-on experience right there in the centers. And all
student parents can access the help Head Start provides, for example,
with applying for public assistance programs.”
How will this get done? The Board reports that the first funding steps have been complete, but now a lot of questions need answers: “What makes a given college a good candidate? Which can
offer the most, and who needs the most? How will schools ensure
students actually take advantage of the option? Will physical spaces
need retrofitting? Will the hours these facilities operate need to
expand beyond what’s typical for the program?”
More on the repairs: The struggle to fix it requires a host of solutions,
many of which must come from legislators. Think increased government
investment, expanded tax credits and reduced barriers to entry for
providers,” the Board opines. “But this kind of large-scale change has proved elusive, which means smaller solutions
are also essential. They can help, and they’re actually within reach.
The beauty of this one, as Abigail Seldin of the Seldin/Haring-Smith
Foundation put it to us, is that it doesn’t require a miracle, and
neither will it take an act of Congress.”
